Cloverfield

Here's another film that steps outside the conventional methods of shooting film. I think this will be another hit-or-miss type of flick, but I enjoyed it mostly just because it's something different.
Shooting the entire movie from the point of view of one hand held camera that travels with a group of friends through New York City as destruction is all around, people will either find this film technique visually entertaining and innovative or just annoying since the camera is extremely shaky.
Although I agree with a lot of people that the footage didn't need to be so shaky as it almost made me sick at some parts, it's nice to be told a story from such a narrow angle sometimes. Then again, some people didn't like the method and would have liked the more generic mainstream style of storytelling so that they could have seen the whole picture.
So in a nutshell, this movie is different than most films by how the content is presented which people either appreciate or find annoying. I'll add though that the monster (clover) is pretty cool and they build up suspense by not over showing the creature.
Trailer

The 4th Kind

I'm not gonna lie, this freaked me out! For you fans out there who enjoyed the Blair Witch Project and Paranormal Activity, this should be your next movie in line to watch.

The 4th Kind takes on an interesting technique in storytelling. It tells the audience from the start that they will be viewing documentary footage along with reanacted cinematic footage. There are a lot of split sceens that show both reels and it works really well. It really makes the viewer buy into the story being real, but I also think they overdid it by stating at the start of the movie that what you are about to see is real; almost making it seem unreal as the Blair Witch and Paranormal Activity didn't need to do this. It seems like they are trying to force the authenticity down your throat.

But overall, it is a unique film and I would suggest giving it a shot. It seems like it will be a hit or miss. I can't see people sitting on the fence about this one. I viewed it with an open mind and really got into, resulting in me walking around the house with the lights on constantly for about a week. Being scared can be fun though. If you want to question the movie, do it after it's over and not during the middle of it.

Watch the Trailer

Clash of the Titans

The special effects and action in this movie were pretty awesome, but it seemed like that was their main concern as the story and dialogue were lacking. It was very visually entertaining (Medusa was great and the Kraken looked fantastic but for some reason didn't show it much after building it up so much), but the story was a little hard to get into, was extremely predictable, and felt a little too rushed. I still walk away telling people it was pretty good, but I just feel like it had more potential especially dealing with a fascinating subject like Greek mythology.

So overall I would go see it, especially if you like action and the classical myths and legends, but just don't let your expectations get too high. Remember that it seems like it was written for special effects, not for the story. Oh, and I also heard the 3-D version is pretty bad. They decided to force a 3-D conversion when they were almost completely done shooting so it turned out kinda bad. So probably just see the normal version, that's what I saw.

Check it out > Trailer

Alice in Wonderland

I've always been a really big Tim Burton fan and have been super pumped for this film ever since I heard about it last summer. The story of Alice in Wonderland is already kind of trippy and bizarre to start with, so I figured that Burton would take it to a whole new level when he got his hands on it. Well, I think I might have had too high of expectations for this flick because it was just "pretty good."
For some reason I thought it was going to be the best movie ever, but Burton seemed to of tuned down his style, probably because he had Disney over his shoulder the whole time. BUT, Alice in Wonderland was still a good movie and I definitely want to see it again. Visually it was very entertaining (especially in 3D), the acting was pretty good, and the legendary Danny Elfman delivered a great score.
All of the Underworld characters were great, the Cheshire Cat probably being my favorite. Visual effects were great as well, and this reinvented Underland is exciting, beautiful, and dark all at the same time. I guess the only real downfall in this movie was the story. The plot seemed pretty bland in general and I felt like there could have been more time with character development.

4 out of 5
Watch the Trailer

Shutter Island

This review is going to be short (and will have no link to a trailer) for a reason. I can see why people would really like this movie, but if you have heard anything at all about it prior to viewing it, it might ruin the experience for you. Unfortunately I heard some things about the movie that changed the way I viewed the film. Seeing this movie having no idea what it's really about and having no expectations is definitely the best way to see it.

So yeah, it was pretty good and Leonardo Dicaprio did a great job (like usual), but it definitely would have been better if I didn't hear anything about it before I saw it.

Wolfman

I'm not sure if this is a film for everyone, but I was excited to go see this movie when I heard it came out because werewolf movies have always fascinated/scared me (probably started when I got chased by some werewolf type things when I was little in the middle of the night). Although it was fairly entertaining, I was expecting it to be better and walked away slightly disappointed.

With the cast that this flick had, the movie has great expectations that just weren't met. The story could have been spiced up a little more and the acting could have been better. However, I was way into the new wolfman look that is way better than the 1941 original. Take a look as the difference between the two. OLD NEW

I like the different approach to the werewolf look that resembles more of a man than a wolf like the Underworld movies do (a great trilogy). The first half of the movie is intense as you don't get a good look at the creature for quite some time. They build it up a lot but then I think they possibly ruin the image somewhat by showing it too much in the end of the movie. I also couldn't help but thinking that it resembled an evil version of Beast from the third X-men movie.

Mentionable Cast

Benicio Del Toro

Anthony Hopkins

Emily Blunt

Hugo Weaving

Watch the Trailer

District-9

I didn't get around to seeing this in theaters but rented it the other day and loved it! It was SO unique and really surprised me. A few reasons why I enjoyed it so much:

• It isn't your typical alien movie when the supernatural come to earth for a purpose, to try and dominate or something. In this scenario, the aliens coexist with the humans and have done so for the last 20 years (it takes place during current times). They accidentally landed here and aren't really that smart; allowing the humans to control them. This was a nice break since I have never seen a plot quite like this.
• The style in which it was filmed was also very unique. The movie has a very documentary feel to it (that is extremely convincing) with a lot of hand-held and surveillance type footage, BUT they also incorporate high quality cinematic shots. They blend the two types together so seamlessly that you don't even realize where the transitions come in. I was very impressed.
• The aliens looked pretty bad ass and the special effects were really neat.
  
• And last but not least, the main actor in the movie did an extraordinary job. I've never seen him in films before but he is really talented.

Watch the Trailer